Archive for the ‘blogging’ Category
The water’s fine has new home
I’ve moved my blog to a new site. Check it out!
Q&A regarding Twittering experiences
Rachael Oehring, a DTH writer for Diversions, asked me to respond to some questions about Twittering for a story she’s writing for a features class. I’ve already posted about my experience Tweeting this weekend during the presidential debate and at an Obama/Biden rally, but I thought I’d include my responses here:
Q: You live-tweeted the Obama rally the other day, and I was just wondering how you got the idea for that? Were there other people in the press area doing the same thing? How was the experience of being at the rally in the first place, and what was it like sitting there texting while Obama was speaking?
A: I decided before the rally that I wanted to live-Tweet it. Until this weekend, I’ve chiefly used Twitter socially vs. journalistically. I wanted to try live-Tweeting an event to see what would work and what wouldn’t. I live-Tweeted the presidential debate with the DTH’s State & National editor, Ariel Zirulnick, on Friday, and learned a lot from that. Our Tweets were too much of a minute-by-minute run down of what was happening, which, with so many people watching the debate, wasn’t needed. In retrospect, we both wished we had included more analysis. I think that my Twittering from the Obama/Biden rally was a good mix of “This is what he said” and crowd reaction. I wish I had brought my laptop, because text-Twittering limited my speed.
I didn’t see anyone else in the press texting, and I kind of felt weird being the only one. Some in the press had laptops and they could have been Twittering, but I didn’t see one way or another. I haven’t seen the result of anyone in the press twittering the rally.
Q: How do you think a technology like Twitter fits in with traditional news outlets? This might be a bit of a stretch, especially since the DTH is pretty open to new technology, but how do you think other papers will utilize this technology? Do you think we’ll reach a point where there will be a bevy of press twittering updates at press conferences and events and such?
A: I would love to see traditional news outlets embrace Twitter more. There’s a balance to strike, because by and large the public hasn’t embraced Twitter, so the audience this form of reporting is directed at is small, but as a story telling form I like it. It’s bite-sized information that I can choose whether to receive or not. Many of the newspapers that have embraced it seem to have embraced it as another way to distribute news as an RSS alternative, but I think robot-Twitter accounts have their limitations. What I enjoy about Twitter is connecting with the other users. At its core, Twitter is simply social networking, and when newspaper’s don’t have that interactive element between their Twitter and their readers, I think readers are more likely to lose interest. I would love to see the press Twitter updates at meetings etc. Its another way of reporting, and then journalists can go back to those “notes” to write the story, which ideally is more nuanced and analytical than Tweet updates.
Q: How does tweeting an event differ from, say, live-blogging an event? Is there a difference?
A: I’ve never live-blogged an event, but I feel the principals of it vs. Twittering are similar. You’re trying to do updates as quickly as possible and as thorough as possible as the time allows for. Twitter imposes an additional space restriction because you only have 140 characters. You’re required to focus in on the key points.
Q: Do you think that something like Twitter is going to alter in any way how news is broken, does it fit in with the 24-hour news cycle of TV news networks and Web sites?
A: I think Twitter’s already altered how news is broken. The earthquake this summer was broken on Twitter before the Los Angeles Times had anything. And it’s not just Twitter that’s changing how news is broken – Wikipedia had Tim Russert’s entry updated to include his death before any news organization released the news. Social media in general makes it a lot easier for non-journalists to break news (and for journalists to break news). Twittering doesn’t give the full scope though – it’s great at announcing the news but hard to fit context into the space allowed. One of my favorite Tweets is this one by @lonelysandwich: “To be fair, if CNN could get away with HOLLYF**K EARTHQAKE!!!1! as the extent of its coverage, they’d likely have scooped your a**, Twitter.” (** mine).
Practicing multimedia with fake breaking news
MSCNE created a simulated event today so that we could practice covering breaking news. In teams, we were supposed to swarm the scene and cover it with video, audio, still photography and whatever online efforts we can muster. The news “broke” at 1 p.m. and we were allowed to report until 2:30 p.m. Now we are working on content and have until 5 p.m. to update the blogs.
My group is incredibly competitive, but I think a lot of the other groups are doing a lot more innovative things with their site than ours. Our group is sitting in the Drewry Room at Grady College where we have access to three desktops (with no photo/video/audio editing capabilities) and two laptops), when we could be in a lab with a computer for each of us and all sorts of tools to work on content. It strikes me as curmudgeonly, because in no way are we taking advantage of the resources we have. We’re very focused on getting the story and the reporting, and we do have interviews the other groups didn’t get, but that’s so old school.
I decided to text updates to Twitter, but only one other person knew what Twitter was, and no one was terribly interested in incorporating that into the site. I took photos and recorded audio and sent four updates, including one immediately after we heard the news as I ran out to the scene. I followed it with this, this and this.
Before I started tweeting about a bomb threat on UGA’s campus, I did one update announcing that all tweets between 1 p.m. and 5 would be related to the exercise, but @shanbow, @breaksthenews and @kev097 pointed out that for those who didn’t see the initial tweet, mine could have caused alarm. For this, I completely agree, and wish I had added “fake” with each post as one of them suggested. In a real-life breaking news situation, I could see tweeting as effective, but it kind of distracted me from the photographing, audio taking and just general paying attention. I stopped twittering at the point our reporters started getting more detailed information, and I think that anymore tweeting wouldn’t have been effective. In the first few minutes of breaking news, before an organization has a chance to figure out what the story is, 140-character tweets would be an effective way to build the story, if the Web site had a feed to display the tweets.
MSCNE gold
MSCNE blue
MSCNE green
Networking and other new things
I’ve spent most of today fixing up this blog and adding new things. I joined LinkedIn and del.icio.us, and re-examined my Twitter account. Social networking, beyond Facebook, is new and while I get its importance, it isn’t something that is thrillingly exciting. I’m trying to get the hang of things, so bear with me.


